CHAPTER 10: PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT

Lake Solano Regional Park

Acknowledgments

Approved June 24, 2003

Solano County Park and Recreation Commission

• Robert Leong, Chairman
• Scott Garrison
• Mike Alvarez

• Carl Heinz

• Anthony Norris, Parks Services Manager

• Veronica Ferguson, General Services Director

Approved June 5, 2003

Solano County Planning Commission

• John L. Moore, Chairman
• James Campbell, Vice-Chairman
• Dorothy Hawkes
• Alan Plutchok

• Ed Stahl

• Michael Yankovich, Planning Program Manager

• Birgitta E. Corsello, Environmental Management Director

Adopted June 24, 2003

Solano County Board of Supervisors

• Duane Kromm, Chairman
• John Silva, Vice-Chairman
• Ruth Forney
• Barbara R. Kondylis

• John Vasquez

• Michael D. Johnson, County Administrator

Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE OF THE PLAN

The Park and Recreation Element of the Solano County General Plan is intended to provide a long range guide for the development of regional recreation facilities and the preservation of natural and historical resources in Solano County.

AUTHORITY AND RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN

Recreation Elements may be adopted as optional elements ofcity and county generall plans under Section 65303 of the California Government Code, which states:

1. The general plan may include the following elements or any part of phase thereof:

(A) A Recreation Element showing a comprehensive system ofareas and public sites for recreation, including and following, and, when practicable, their locations and proposed development Natural reservations - Parks - Parkways - Beaches - Playgrounds - Recreational community gardens - Other recreation areas

By law, if a Recreation Element is adopted, objectives and other proposals are required to be consistent with other elements of the General Plan. The Park and Recreation Element has been developed to be consistent with all elements of the Solano County General Plan.

The two elements which are most relevant are the Resource Conservation and Open Space Plan, and the Tri-City and County Open Space Plan, both of which have become elements of the County General Plan. The goals, objectives, and proposals within the Park and Recreation Element are in concert with the goals, objectives, and policies of these General Plan elements. For example, Goal #1 of the Park and Recreation Element is "To preserve and manage a diverse system of regional parks and natural resources for the enjoyment of present and future County residents." A goal of the Resource Conservation and Open Space Plan is "To preserve for subsequent generations the greatest possible freedom of choice in the use and enjoyment of the County's natural resources." Similarly, an objective of the Tri-City and 2 County Open Space Plan is "To provide for the present and future needs for compatible regional outdoor recreational opportunities in the County through continual recreation planning for the Cooperative Planning Area."

Implementarion of the proposals within the Park and Recreation Element should consider the content and status of the two plans, including any subsequent revisions.

METHODOLOGY

The Park and Recreation Element is oriented toward fulfilling the regional recreation needs of Solano County residents. The plan identifies existing and projected recreation needs in the County within a time frame extending to 2015. Policies, objectives and proposals of the plan focus on meeting these needs. Planning work was carried out under the direction of the Solano County Environmental Management Department and the Solano County Park Division, and assisted by an advisory group with representatives of the Greater Vallejo Recreation District, the cities of Benicia, Dixon, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun Ciry and Vacaville, the Bureau of Reclamation, the Bay Area Open Space Council, the Delta Protection Commission, the Putah Creek Discovery Corridor Group, and others (see Appendix H). The Plan is a living document which should be revised as needed, and considered for updating at least every five years.

The Park and Recreation Element takes a countywide approach to recreation planning, assigning to the County a role as promoter and coordinator among the various local, state and federal agencies involved in providing regional recreational opportunities in Solano County. The plan assumes that the cities and the Greater Vallejo Recreation District will continue to provide neighborhood and community parks, as well as those regional parks which are now operated or have been proposed by cities. The County is to be the primary provider of regional parks in unincorporated areas.

PLAN FORMAT

Following the Introduction, the Park and Recreation Element is divided into five additional chapters. Chapter Two sets forth and discusses overall goals and objectives of the plan. Chapter Three describes the current administrative framework and regional recreation facilities in the County. Chapter Four identifies current and projected recreation needs. Chapter Five proposes plans for meeting regional recreation needs in the County. Chapter Six details ways these plans could be implemented. Appendixes and References conclude the Element.

Chapter Two: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Two overall goals have been adopted to guide regional recreation planning in Solano County:

1. Preserve and manage a diverse system of regional parks and natural resources for the enjoyment of present and future County residents and park visitors.

2. Promote, develop and manage diversified recreational facilities to meet the regional recreation needs of the County.

The goals reflect two themes apparent in past recreation policies as well as in goals and objectives of other County general plan elements: first, protection of natural and recreational resources; and second, provision of new facilities as needed. The goals are also consistent with state and federal recreation policies, which assign responsibility to counties for carrying out countywide recreation planning, and for coordinating and/or developing facilities to serve regional and local areas.

Eleven objectives were established to direct efforts toward achieving the goals. These objectives fall into four general areas of current concern in recreation planning. Topic areas relating to Goal 1 include countywide planning and coordination of recreational plans and activities, and land use considerations in identifying and developing recreation facilities and protecting resource areas. Goal 2 relates to the development of specific recreation facilities by the County and other public agencies and the role of private enterprise in recreation development. The objectives are more specific and manageable aims than the goals themselves and are, in turn, supported by a series of policies and proposals. The policies and proposals are designed to lead toward achievement of the plan goals and objectives.

Plan objectives and general policies are presented below under the topic areas to which they relate. More specific implementation strategies are contained in the Plan Proposals set forth in Chapter Five.

COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AND COORDINATION

The California Outdoor Recreation Resources Plan assigns a countywide planning and coordinating role to counties, including both recreation planning and coordination of plans and activities with those of other counties, cities and other levels of government. Solano County presently exercises a countywide planning function in other elements of the General Plan, most notably the Land Use Element. This element seeks to coordinate plans of the cities, the County and other entities that have an interest in the County, as well as to achieve some countywide goals. The Park and Recreation Plan is similarly oriented in that it seeks to coordinate recreation plans of the County, the cities, the Greater Vallejo Recreation District, the State, and the federal government in a manner which will best meet the regional recreation needs of County residents. The County has a responsibility to work actively with these and other agencies and private organizations to achieve rhe aims set forth in the plan. Through its countywide planning role, the County is able to identify significant recreational needs and resources, and to work with the appropriate agencies to ensure their needs are met. The County can also support efforts of cities to provide regional recreation opportunities for their residents by means of direct planning and development cooperation where needed, and by advocating city proposals to other agencies from which cooperation or funds are requested. Demand for identified recreational needs in the County is projected to continue. Since many of these needs can be met by cities, districts and other agencies, as well as by the County, general policies to encourage development of the needed facilities by all appropriate parties should be clearly set forth. In addition, the County can negotiate agreements with other public agencies and private organizations for joint or reciprocal undertakings to protect resource areas, acquire additional resource areas, provide recreation benefits which might otherwise not be enjoyed, or to carry out operations more economically.

Objective 1

Coordinate the planning and development of regional recreational facilities between federal, state, and local agencies within Solano County.

Policies

A. The County shall work with and assist local agencies and districts in identifying and protecting significant regional recreation resources.

B. The County shall work with local agencies and districts in identifying regional recreation needs, and coordinating and supporting plans and programs to address those needs.

C. The County shall encourage and support other public agencies and private groups in the development of regional recreation facilities that are consistent with Park and Recreation Element objectives. D. The County shall support and advocate proposals that advance County recreation goals and objectives to other agencies that may provide funding and assistance. E. The County shall actively pursue cost-effective joint or reciprocal agreements with other governmental jurisdictions or private groups for the acquisition, development and operation of regional recreation facilities.

Objective 2

Ensure that there are at least ten (l0) acres of regional and local parkland per each 1,000 persons.

Policies

A. Through its planning role, the County shall work with other agencies and private interests ro provide for adequate regional parkland and facilities.

B. The County shall actively participate in the planning of projects that have regional recreation benefits.

C. The County shall encourage and support local agency efforts to achieve their objectives for providing local park land. All local providers seek to provide at least five acres of parkland for each 1,000 persons.

D. The County shall seek available state and federal grant funds for acquiring and developing regional parks.

E. The County shall encourage and support other public agencies and private groups in the development of regional recreation faciliries that are consistent with Park and Recreation Element objectives.

LAND USE

There are a number of areas in the County which are especially rich in recreation potential due to the presence of significant natural features or resources. The Solano Land Trust and other non-profit organizations have acquired and manage several resource areas. For example, the Solano Land Trust owns and manages the Jepson Prairie Preserve, Lynch Canyon, and Rush Ranch. These areas are open to the public. They offer a wide range of recreational opportunities, and resource restoration and interpretive services are provided. It is the County's responsibility, in cooperation with other agencies and organizations, to evaluate and identify those areas which are best suited to meet the County's varied recreational needs. This includes identifying and protecting specific recreational sites proposed for development, and sites which may have potential for development sometime in the future. Recreational resource areas, which provide opportunities for both active and passive recreational activities, should also be protected.

In identifying and developing specific recreation sites, consideration must be given ro potential conflicts that can occur with adjacent land uses. Shooting ranges and off-road vehicle parks, are, perhaps, the most difficult facilities to site due to anticipated impacts of noise and safety hazards. Other types of recreational facilities, however, can creare conflicts in the areas of ttaffic and parking problems, noise, theft and vandalism. Conversely, adjacent land uses can impact recreational areas through such things as visual impacts, erosion problems, and effects of agricultural practices such as spraying of pesticides. Some of these problems can be mitigated through 6 such measures as fencing and noise barriers, and rhrough restricring hours of park operation. It is more effective, however, to avoid such problems altogether through careful siting of recreational facilities and through planning for appropriate surrounding land uses. Good land use planning can also reduce cosrs of recreational development. Appropriate buffer zones within the park boundaries shall be considered according to the type of recreation and adjacent property uses. Park sites are to be planned to be protective of their own natural and cultural resources, as well as the agricultural areas and watersheds in which they are situated.

Multiple use of land for recreation and other pursuits can reduce or offset costs of recreation development and management and increase recreation value and enjoyment. This approach is particularly useful in the case of public lands held by other agencies, such as water and sewer districts, where significant recreation potential exists. In addition, recreational resource areas provide expanded opportunities for active and passive recreation activities through multiple use of lands within these areas. Regional recreation activities usually center on a principal natural feature. These areas should be developed in a manner compatible with the natural resources and surrounding land uses. Multiple uses rend to ensure continuing enjoyment by rhe public.

Objective 3

Identify, preserve and manage significant regional recreation and natural areas.

Policies

A. The County shall identify natural resource areas that may provide for regional recreation opportunities.

B. The County shall use native plants as a water conservation measure.

C. The County shall work to protect identified recreational sites and natural resource areas.

D. Recreation activities and facilities shall not adversely impacr adjacent land uses. Special attention shall be given to the agriculture and watershed of the area in this regard. Special attention may include: - Appropriate fencing - Noise barriers - Hours of operation

E. Recreation activities and facilities shall not adversely impact habitats which support state and federally threatened or endangered species.

Objective 4

Ensure that land use surrounding existing and potential County regional parks are compatible with park resources and public use.

Policies

A. Areas surrounding regional parks should be maintained in open space or other compatible uses to protect the natural setting and environment of the park site.

B. Land use development proposals adjacent ro regional parks shall be reviewed for compatibility with natural and recreational features and uses of the park.

Objective 5

Encourage appropriate multiple uses of public land for recreation and other uses.

Policies

A. The County shall make the optimum use of public lands by developing or promoting development of facilities that are compatible with the primary resources of the site. B. The County shall support passive and active recreational uses that are compatible with the primary resources of the land.

FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT

Solano County traditionally has limited its facilities development role to provision of regional parks. State policy also assigns a regional park development role to counties, with county development of community and neighborhood parks needed only where urban neighborhoods exist in unincorporated areas. In Solano County, under General Plan policies, all development at urban density is ro be located in cities. The County has a modest sized rural residential population that is served by County regional parks.

The County has identified particular recreation needs that were determined by several means, including inventory of existing sites, state data, discussions with recreation providers in the County, and direct communication with members of the public through community forums. Emphasis should be placed on addressing those needs identified as having highest priority, including activities that cannot be totally accommodated within an urban setting. Consideration should also be given to the special needs of the elderly, physically impaired, and low-income persons in the planning, development, and operation of regional. recreation facilities.

Located within Solano County are a number ofsignificant natural resources including mountains, water bodies and marshes which, in addition to scenic enjoyment, may provide for recreational activities not usually available in developed parks. In the siting and development of regional recreation facilities, the County should consider natural resource features that may provide expanded recreational opportunities. 8 Consideration should also be given to assuring adequate access to regional recreation sites. Opportunities exist for providing trail and public transportation linkages between sites and population centers. Necessary support facilities to accommodate projected usage of recreational facilities must also be considered in facility development. Finally, with limited funding available for acquisition, development and operation of regional parks, the County must find alternative funding sources.

Objective 6

Plan and develop regional recreational facilities which offer opportunities for a wide variety of activities.

Policies

A. The County shall give development priority to recreation sites that can accommodate multiple activities that best address rhe identified recreational needs and take advantage ofsignificant natural features rhat enhance the recreational expenence.

B. Water development plans/land use plans for the Belden's Landing facility and any new parks such as those proposed in the vicinity ofArgyll Park and the Western Railroad Museum shall be consistent with the land use compatibility criteria of the Travis Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan and the noise criteria under the Health and Safety Element.

C. Recreational sites shall be designed and developed in a manner that enhances natural features and recreational use, and minimizes environmental impacts to the site and adjacent lands. D. The County shall consider the special needs of the elderly and the physically impaired in the design and development of recreational facilities. E. The County shall ensure adequate parking and non-vehicular access to recreational facilities. F. The County shall encourage the development of transit services between its recreational facilities and population centers. G. The County shall expand existing park revenue, seek new sources of funds, and explore innovative funding arrangements for developing and maintaining county recreational facilities. H. The County shall support facilities and activities that meet the needs of a culturally diverse population. 9

Objective 7: Provide for the regional recreation needs of the County.

Policies

A. The County shall provide sites and opportunities for recreational activities that cannot be accommodated within urban areas, as funds and sites ate available. B. The County shall encourage development oflinkages (such as riding, hiking and biking trails) between population centers and regional recreation facilities. Any trail system which links parklands cannot conflict with agriculture and other land uses. c. Recreational needs of rural residents shall be considered in the design and development of rural residential subdivisions and parklands. Appropriate buffers will be provided to protect agriculture. D. The County shall provide technical assistance to organizations and groups who want to develop and!or operate regional parks and recreation facilities.

Objective 8: Accomplish all the projects included within the County Parks Capital

Improvement Plan (seeAppendix G).

Policies

A. The County shall maintain a multi-year Parks Capital Improvement Plan and work to accomplish identified projects within the target completion dates. B. The County shall ensure that capital improvements are consistent with the Master Site Plan fot each park, while also accommodating upgrades that meet legal requirements and urgent remediations. PRIVATE RECREATION DEVELOPMENT In Solano County, private recreation enterprises have played a role in providing recreational opportunities such as motorcross, picnicking, golfing and boating. More intensive commercial recreation opportunities such as bowling alleys, theaters, miniature golLmd skating rinks are provided within urban areas. Private enterprise can help to fill the growing need for recreation opportunities in Solano County. This can be accomplished through development of privately owned commercial recreation facilities, or through private development and operation of facilities and services within County and urban parks, It is important, howevet, to ensure that such private operations on County park land help to meet the needs of Solano County residents at affordable rates. 10

Objective 9: Encourage the development of private recreational areas within the

unincorporated area, which complement public recreation facilities within the County. This may include privately developed campgrounds, golf courses, fishing lakes, etc.

Policies

A. The County shall encourage privately developed recreational facilities that expand public regional recreation opportunities. B. Private recreation facilities should be located and designed in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on surrounding residential, agricultural and open space uses. c. Intensive private commercial recreational developments may be confined to County urban areas if supporting public facilities and services are required. D. The County may provide for private concessions within County parks that do not adversely effect park resources, and provide a needed service for visitors at an affordable cost. Such concessions cannot conflict with the needs of adjacent agriculture and other land uses.

MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

As stewards of public lands and other assets, it is important that the management of County regional parks is effective in protecting natural resources and facilities, and provide cost effective services. One method of providing cost effective facilities is by partnering with private and non-profit organizations. Enjoyment of natural resources such as native vegetation, wildlife, and water requires careful management so that the resource is not denegrated by public use. Likewise, park facilities must be provided and maintained in a cost effective manner. In California, there are documented "best practices" for the development and!or management of regional park resources. The County should regularly compare its management, operational standards, and techniques to ensure that they are consistent with "best practices" within the public parks and recreation profession.

Objective 10: Develop and maintain a park volunteer program to enhance volunteer

services within regional parks. 11

Policies

A. The County shall work with existing county volunteers and agencies operating regional parks to identity opportunities for volunteer services within regional parks. B. The County shall provide staff support to maintain an effective regional parks volunteer program. c. The County shall provide staff support for park advisory groups made up of frequent users, nearby property owners, community representatives and others for county operated parks. D. The County shall develop and maintain an ''Adopt A Park" program.

Objective 11: Develop and maintain a marketing program to promote use of

regional parks.

Policies

A. In cooperation with other providers of regional parks within the County, the County shall identify the use capacity of each regional park. B. The County shall determine the costs and benefits associated with increasing the use of regional parks. c. The County shall provide adequate support to promote regional parks use when such use can be financially self-supporting. Lake Solano Regional Park 12 I I

Chapter Three

RECREATION TODAY

This chapter gives an overview of the provision of recreation opportunities in Solano County today. It includes a discussion of the roles ofvarious governmenral agencies, non-profit organizations, and private enterprise, in providing recreation, as well as a discussion and analysis of the current recreation facility inventory countywide.

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

In California, recreation plans, policies and programs are formulated and carried out by federal, state, regional, county and city government agencies and by special districts. Various governmental agencies provide recreational opportunities within Solano County. Federal The federal government does not operate any public recreation facilities within the County. However, they do own property within the County that has recreation value and potential. One example is property at Mare Island. In Rio Vista, the Coast Guard station may provide for additional recreation value at some point in the future. In addition to federal property within the County, federal recreation land facilities in adjacent counties provide recreation opportunities for Solano County residents. The California Department of Parks and Recreation prepares and maintains a Statewide Recreation Plan that meets federal guidelines and serves as a guide for allocating recreational resources within the state. The department also maintains an assessment of current and projected recreation needs in California. These tools are used ro help plan for state recreation facilities bur are also available to local governments ro assist their.planning efforts. The Department of Parks and Recreation owns and operates the Benicia State Recreation Area and the Benicia Capitol State Historic Park in Solano County. The California Department of Fish and Game provides opportunities for hunting, fishing and nature study on natural habitat in the Suisun and Napa Marshes, and along Putah Creek near Monticello Dam. Regional The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) carries out regional recreation planning for the nine-county San Ftancisco Bay Area, which includes Solano 13 County. ABAG refers to its adopted recreation and open space goals and policies when reviewing locall plans and project proposals, but ABAG does not build or operate its own recreational facilities. The Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) is a state agency formed to preserve and protect San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. BCDC prepares and administers the San Francisco Bay Plan which includes recreation plans and policies for that portion of Solano County within its jurisdiction, generally the County shoreline from the western end of Island No. 1 east to Collinsville and including the Suisun and Napa Marshes. Recreation departments in Solano County cities plan, develop and operate neighborhood and community parks, which is a traditional city role. Most of the cities also maintain some special activity facilities such as boat launch ramps, trails, historic facilities, community centers and baseball fields. Fairfield, Vacaville and Benicia each operate a regional size park. All of the cities in the County have recreation departments with the exception ofVallejo, which is served primarily by the Greater Vallejo Recreation Disrrict. The City ofVallejo does operate a municipal marina and a senior center, and contracts with private parties for the operation of its three golf courses. The City also administers numerous Landscape Maintenance Disrricts which contain important natural resources. Special Districts The Greater Vallejo Recreation District (GVRD) serves a 65 square mile area including incorporated Vallejo and some adjoining unincorporated areas. GVRD provides neighborhood and community parks, and special activity facilities. County County government has assumed an overall planning role for Solano County through the General Plan, which seeks to coordinate plans of the cities, the County and other entities which have an interest in the County, as well as to achieve some countywide goals such as the preservation of agriculture and maintenance of open space. The Park and Recreation Element, as an element of the General Plan, petforms this overall planning function specifically in the area of recreation. Through the Park and Recreation Element, the County assumes a coordinating role among the various agencies and private entities which have direct roles in the provision of regional recreation in Solano County. In addition to its overall planning and coordination role, the County develops and operates regional park facilities. At present the County operates regional parks at 14 Lake Solano on Putah Creek, Sandy Beach near Rio Vista, and Belden's Landing boat launch facility within the Suisun Marsh area. Since virtually all urban development in Solano County occurs in the incorporated cities, there is no foreseeable need for neighborhood or community parks in unincorporated areas. It is anticipated that rhe ciries and GVRD will continue ro provide neighborhood and community parks, and continue to operate their existing regional parks, while the County will provide for new regional facilities. Solano Land Ttust This non-profit organization acquires and manages areas ofsignificant resource values. Properties operared by the Trust are open ro rhe public for recreational and educational purposes. The Trusr works in cooperation with private land owners and government agencies in order to protect important open space within Solano County. Tri-City and County Cooperative Group This Joint Powers Authority OPAl exists to protect and manage for public benefit the 10,000-acre Sky Valley-Cordelia Hills Open Space Project in southern Solano County. The JPA includes the cities of Benicia, Fairfield, and Vallejo and the County of Solano.

EXISTING FACILITIES

Table 1 shows total Solano County park acreage by type offacility and operaring

[TABLE PLACEHOLDER – See PDF] agency. The division of responsibility for different types of parks between cities and the County may be easily seen, as described under "Administrative Framework" above. One exception to the usual pattern is the substantial regional park acreage provided in cities. A definition of the terms used for describing types of parks will help the reader understand Table 1. Definitions for Local and Regional Areas Local Parks are typically operared by cities and recreation districts and may include the following: Neighborhood Parks - Serve as primary recreation resource for a neighborhood - Service area is up ro one-half mile walking distance - Usually not more than 10 acres in size - Limited ro day use only. - Limited or no off street parking - No entrance fees Community Parks - Focus is on meeting the recreation needs of several neighborhoods - Service area is up to three miles - Optimal size is 15-20 acres, depending on usable space 15 - Developed for both active and passive uses - Lighted outdoor facilities and indoor meeting area - No entrance fees Regional Parks are typically operated by counties or regional recreation districts and are generally described as follows: - Serve twO Ot more communities - Service area is usually up to a one hour drive - Natural or cultural resource is usually the basis for the park - Minimal size is typically fifty acres - Entrance or parking fees common Regional Preserves are areas with ourstanding natural or cultural features that are protected for their intrinsic value as well as for the enjoyment and education of the public. The essential feature of a Regional Preserve may be open space; wilderness; scenic beauty; flora; fauna; or archeological, historic or geological resources. The name of the pteserve may reflect these features, e.g. Huckleberty Botanic Preserve. Generally, the size of a Regional Preserve is determined by the characteristics, nature and needs of its special features. An Open Space Preserve will generally consist ofat least 200 acres of undeveloped open space land within or bordering an urban area. An Open Space Preserve may be used for agriculture or for passive recreational activities that do not require substantial facilities or improvements. Regional Recreation Areas provide a variety ofoutdoor recreation experiences on a site that is particularly well suited to the type of recreational activities. A Regional Recreation Area will be at least 40 acres in size, including both land and water area. The area must have established regional recreation facilities or the potential to provide the opportunities for regional facilities such as picnicking, swimming, fishing, camping and boating. The area must lend itself to development for a variety of uses that meet recreational needs, and it must be able to withstand intense public use. Recreation/Staging Unitsare generally located near access roads on relatively flat land areas and along natural or artificial water bodies-areas that are suitable for more intensive public recreational use and are ofsufficient size to support the necessary parking, utilities, and infrastructure needed for such use. Recreation/Staging Units include restroorns and showers, picnic areas, turfed meadows, interpretive facilities, play structures, camping facilities, equestrian facilities, meeting rooms, shelters, and aquaric facilities. Ideally, these areas are clustered and located at the edges of the parks, bur they may be located within a park in special circumstances. Areas of higher level recreational use and concentrations ofservice facilities should be designated as Recreation/Staging Units. Where possible, these areas will be clustered and located on the edges of the park. SOURCE: "Park, Recreation, OpenSpace andGreenway Guidelines," National Recreation andParkAssociation, 19%. 16

Table 1

[TABLE PLACEHOLDER – See PDF] Countywide ParkAcreage Summary Neighbomood Parks Community Parks Regional Parks State Recreation Areas TOTALS Cities" 499 481 1650 2630 County 229 228 State 367 367 TOTALS 499 481 1879 367 3225 * Includes parks operated by the Greater Vallejo Recreation District. SOURCE: Parkland Inventory; November 2002, SolanoSouncy

Facility Inventory

A complete inventory of recreation facilities in Solano County is contained in AppendixA. Facilities available at city parks are dominated by structured (baseball diamonds, basketball courts, soccer fields) and unstructured (open gtassy area) playfields, playground equipment and picnic areas. Cities also typically have a community center, swimming pools, and other facilities. County facilities include three regional parks offering recreation activities such as camping, picnicking, fishing, boating and swimming. State facilities include a historic site, a day use recreation area, and wildlife areas. These lands, together with federal lands, provide the vast majority of nature study opportunities in the County. Geoge"phic Distribution In general, recreation facilities and opportunities for specific activities are well dis- . tributed through the County. One exception is the Dixon area where city parks are the only recreation facilities available. The residents of this small city are well served, however, by two large community parks. The area surrounding Dixon is devoted almost exclusively to intensive agriculture, which offers visual open space value. There are no notable natural resources which would lend themselves to regional or state park development, and such parks could present potential conflict with agricultural operations such as aerial spraying. It should also be noted that there are no County regional parks in southern Solano 17 County. This lack is mitigated, however, by the ptesence of the Benicia State Recreation Area which is operated by State Parks, and Lake Herman Park, which is operated by the city of Benicia. Picnicking, swimming, playgrounds, structured and unstructured playfields and nature study areas are well distributed around the County. Boating and fishing ate, of course, available only where there are suitable bodies of water in the VallejoBenicia, Fairfield-Suisun, and Rio Vista areas and at Lake Solano on the County's northern boundary. Camping is available at Sandy Beach Park and Lake Solano, as well as at private resorts in the Delta area near Rio Vista. Iurisdictional Chatactetistics and Guidelines Recreation and park standards commonly accepted in the past have called for 10 acres of city parks and 10 acres of regional parks for each 1,000 persons in the population. Experience in recent years has indicated that these acreage figures may be too high, and that acreage standards alone are not adequate for meeting recreational needs. In 1996, national standards were replaced by suggested guidelines encouraging each county and community to establish its own acres-to-population park standards. This Park and Recreation Element recommends ten total acres of local and regional parkland for each 1,000 petsons. Ptivate Facilities Private recreation facilities in the County offer a somewhat different spectrum of activities from those in the public sector, For the most part this is to be expected, since private operators must charge users enough to meet expenses or make a profit, while most public facilities offer activities below cost or free. There is some overlap in the areas ofswimming, fishing, boating, camping, and hunting bur private facilities where these activities are available tend to offer additional amenities. Boar mooring facilities in the County ate mostly private. Launch facilities, on the other hand, may be found at both public and private facilities. Campsites in the County ate also provided by private and public operators. Hunting, an activity that is especially popular in the Suisun Marsh, is carried out on public lands belonging to the Department of Fish and Game, as well as on the premises of numerous private clubs. These clubs offer the advantages oflimited number of hunters, and often the comforts ofa clubhouse and other facilities. 18

Chapter Four

RECREATION NEEDS

This chapter identifies present and projected recreation needs in Solano County through analysis of the user population coupled with the inventory of existing facilities described in Chapter Three. Needs for which the County was identified as a potential provider, and potential sites for needed facilities, are identified. Needs and sites are then matched, and non-facility need solutions such as programs to increase use of existing sites, are identified to form the basis for the plan proposals detailed in Chapter Six.

IDENTIFYING NEEDS

Several information sources were employed to determine recreation need characteristics of the Solano County population. These included population projections, demographic information, data from a statewide recreation survey, observations of local park and recreation providers, statements of need by members of the public, and public participation in a survey conducted via the Solano County web site. Population and Recreation Characteristics The 2000 Federal Census counted 394,542 persons in Solano County. This figure represents an increase 0[159,339 persons or 40% since the 1980 Census, making Solano the fastest growing county in the San Francisco Bay Area in percentage terms. "Projections 2002" by the Association of Bay Area Governments predict this growrh pattern to continue with 512,000 residents expected in Solano County by 2015 (see Appendix D). These figures clearly indicate that there will be a need for increases in recreation facilities and opportunities in Solano County during the planning time frame. This conclusion is further reinforced by state figures, which show that 70% of away-from-home activities occurs within an hour's travel time from home. Proiected Recreation Demand . State recreation survey data was used to project future demand for the San Francisco Bay Area. Activities for which the greatest number of participation days were recorded in 1993 were also the activities for which the greatest increase in participation days was projected. The top activities were swimming and beach related activities, walking, visiting scenic areas, and bicycling. The fastest growing activities in terms of percentage increases were projected to be hiking and backpacking, boating, nature appreciation, fishing and camping. The grearest amount of public support for new facilities included developed camping, trails for hiking, and nature study access. 19 Local Need Perceptions In order to ensure that the Park and Recreation Element needs assessment reflects the specific needs of Solano County as accurately as possible, local park and recreation providers and more than 500 members of the public were surveyed. Each local recreation provider was asked what recreation needs he or she believed the county should address in its regional parks (see Appendix C). Early in the recreation planning effort, approximately one hundred residents attended four public forums which were held to solicit input from the public (see Appendix B). In addition, the County included a Recreation Needs survey on its web site and received more than 400 responses. Needs expressed included improved public trails for hiking and biking, overnight camping, group picnicking areas, regional cultural facilities and areas of natural and historic value. Needs Summary The discussion of existing recreation facilities in Chapter Three indicated that there are existing shortages of park areas. The County also lacks an adequate trails system and there is a need for camping and other facilities typical of regional parks. As the County population grows during the planning period, demand for rhe following activities is expected to be particularly great: Group Camping Trails Family Camping Group Picnicking Visiting scenic!cultural places Other activities and facilities for which there may be a significant increase in demand include: Sports fields Boating Nature appreciation Regional sports complex Equestrian trails Off-road recreation Problems inhibiting participation, which are of concern to the County in terms of planning, include the need for public transportation to recreation facilities, cost of participation, and poor accessibility for physically impaired persons.

MEETING NEEDS

This section considers means of meeting the County's recreation needs. Individual needs are analyzed and potential providers identified. Potential facility sites are identified and evaluated, and priorities for the Recreation Element Proposals are established. 20 I Needs Analysis Factors which must be considered in planning to meet Solano County's regional recreation needs include the magnitude of projected demand, specific nature of the needs, availability ofsuitable sites, institutional, land use and environmental conmaims, geographic locality of the needs, range ofappropriate providers, and funding considerations. Significant factors for each of the needs identified in rhe preceding section are discussed below. A. Completion ofPlans Developed byLocal Agencies toAcquire and Develop Additional Parks- Local park and recreation agencies have plans for adding forty new parks totaling 606 acres (see Appendix E). B. Regional Tjpe Parkin Southern County- The need for a regional type park in southern Solano County could, conceivably, be met by the 648 acre Lake Herman Park operated by the city of Benicia. Additional facilities would be needed. C. Hiking/Biking Trails System- There are many existing trail segments in various parks throughout the County as well as bike lanes on many city streets. This element neither includes nor approves any hiking or biking system in Solano County. Any trail system which links parklands cannot conflict with agriculture and other land uses. D. Sports- Sports facilities are typically provided by cities at neighborhood and community parks, and at school sites. Private facilities also serve a portion of the demand for some activities such as tennis, racquetball and bodybuilding. There appears to be a need for additional sports fields such as baseball and soccer. E. Camping- Within the region, this high-demand activity is currently provided by rhe County, the state and the private sector. There is potential for additional development by local communities operating regional parks. Greatest demand is expected to be in the southern portion of the County because of its proximity to the Bay Area. Group camping needs can be met by developing adequate facilities for groups of 25 or more. Appropriare buffers can be provided between campsites and agricultural uses in the area. E Group Picnicking- Group picnicking, another high-demand activity, is more difficult to provide for since it typically requires assemblages ofclosely spaced tables, eirher trees or a shelter for shade, and large adjacent grassy areas for play. Potential for these facilities exists at regional parks and by acquiring additional land to expand existing parks. G. Visiting Scenic or Cultural Places- This need encompasses a number of potential activities. Driving or hiking through scenic areas, visiting waterfronts and orher points of interest, as well as visiting museums, historical sites and other cultural 21 facilities. In Solano County the marsh areas, the Vaca Mountains and the VallejoBenicia Hills provide areas ofscenic beauty, which can be enjoyed through special visits as well as driving by. As the County grows it will be important to preserve these and other scenic areas. Cultural facilities in Solano County are not numerous but do include the Benicia State Capitol, the VacavilleMuseum, the Mira Theater in Vallejo, the Vallejo Naval and Historical Museum, the Rio Vista Museum, the Pena Adobe, and the Western Railway Museum. H Boating- Boating facilities are presently provided by the County, the waterfront cities, the State Department of Fish and Game and by private resorts and marinas. New facilities, which will help to meet the projected increase in demand, may include Lagoon Valley Park and expansion ofcamping at Sandy Beach Park. 1. Nature Appreciation- Opportunities for nature appreciation are currently available at city, county and state facilities in Solano County. The need is not so much for additional acreage as it is for improved access and interpretive facilities. Improved facilities, as outlined in the Plan Proposals chapter, would assist with the access problem. Also, more interpretive facilities in the Suisun Marsh will be of assistance to the general public in understanding this unique area. J Off-Road Vehicles- There is currently an off-road vehicle facility at the privately owned and operated Argyll Park east ofTravis Air Force Base. In addition, mountain biking is a popular activity at Rockville Hills Park in Fairfield. K Regional Sports Facility- Sports faciliries are located in all cities within the County. A regional sports facility could be developed and operated by a public-private partnership program to meet the growing need for such facilities. L. Equestrian Trails- Currently there are no public equestrian trails in Solano County. There is potential for development ofsuch trails at Lake Herman, Mare Island, Rockville Hills Park and at the McIntyre Ranch area operated by the GVRD, as well as Lake Solano Parle M Low-Cost Facilities- Recreational facilities operated by public agencies in the County are presently free or at low cost. Fiscal pressures on all levels of government, however, create pressures to increase fees for many services and facilities. Care musr be taken that public facilities remain affordable and accessible to all residents. This may require a combination offee increases and cost-cutting techniques for park operations. N Facilities fOr the Physically Impaired- Recreation facilities open to the public, whether operated by public or private entities, are required by law to be accessible for the physically impaired. There is potential to develop nature walks and other facilities specifically designed for rhe physically impaired within new and existing parks in Solano County. 22 I I I

Potential Providers

Potential providers of facilities to meet the recreation needs include the cities, special districts, the county, the state and non-profit organizations. The County, in its role as coordinator, establishes policies supporting the roles of various entities in meeting recreation needs but the County has a more limited role in actual provision of facilities. Since little urban density development exists in the unincorporated area and none is projected for the future, the County limits its facilities role ro the provision of regional parks and special activity facilities, which cannot be accommodated in the cities. The cities typically provide neighborhood and community parks, some special activity facilities and a few regional type facilities. The State of California has one historical facility and one recreation area in Solano County, in addition to its many acres of wildlife habitat in the marshes and along Putah Creek. In many cases, several providers have appropriate roles in meeting needs and, for those items where greatest demand is expected, it will probably be necessary to draw on the resources ofall potential providers to adequately meet demand.

County Plan Proposals

The basis for the Park and Recreation Element proposals was developed by prioritizing the regional needs for which the County has a leadership or provider role, and identifying appropriate projects for meeting the needs. High Priority* Hiking/biking trails Camping Group picnicking Facilities for the physically impaired Nature appreciation Historic appreciation Medium Priority" Fishing Off-road recreation Sports fields Equestrian trails Low Priority" Golfing Boating Swimming "' NOTE: Needs arc not prioritized within groups. 23

Potential Facility Sites

Existing regional parks and sites which might be acquired and developed to help meer the County's priority recreation needs were identified and evaluated according to the following assessment criteria: - Accessibility - Proximity to major population centers - Complements other area recreation facilities - Porential land use conflicts - Need for the facility in the area - Expressed local desire for potential acrivities - Cost ofdevelopment - Cost of maintenance - Availability/cost of property - Special features with recreational value - Range ofactivities that can be accommodated The following sites were found to have the most potential during the planning period: - Lagoon Valley Park - Benicia State Recreation Area - Lake Herman Park - Rockville Hills Park - Sandy Beach Park - Putah Creek public lands - Western Railway Museum Area - Lake Solano Park - Argyll Park Area - Belden's Landing - Suisun Marsh Fishing Access Areas All of the sites listed are shown on the plan map or discussed in Chapter Five: Plan .Proposals. 24

Chapter Five

PLAN PROPOSALS AND IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS This chapter sets forth specific project proposals which are intended to protect, and maximize, the value of existing County park resources. These projects are also aimed at meeting ientified regional recreation needs. As a group, the projects represent implementation measures for accomplishing the goals, objectives, and policies within the Park and Recreation Element. The proposals are not listed in any priority order but are organized into three categories: Planning, Acquisition and Development, and Management. Each proposal is accompanied by rationale and a recommended lead agency, project timing, and a funding source. An Implementation Schedule is included on page 39. Sandy Beach Regional Park 25

PLANNING

Proposal #1 Develop a Master Development/Use Plan for Sandy Beach, Lake Solano, and Belden's Landing Counry Parks. Rationale In order to protect existing resources and maximize public enjoyment of Solano Counry parks, it is important to identify and plan for future public use. Each site is unique and should have a Master Plan for new facilities and improved facilities. Each Plan would discuss the desirabiliry and feasibiliry for changes within the park, as well as expansion opportunities and operational requirements. The Master Plan would provide recommendations and the estimated cost for rehabilitation of existing facilities, acquisition cost for additional land, the development and operation of new facilities. The preparation of Master Plans should involved participation from frequent park users, nearby properry owners, governmental agencies and other interested parties. Master Plans will also provide guidance ro Counry staff in the preparation of its multiple year Capital Improvement Program.

LeadAgency

Solano Counry Parks Division

Timing

Within One year of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

$75,000 - 100,000

FundingSource

State Park Bond Funds 26 II I Proposal #2 Determine if a regional sports facility is needed and can be self supporting. Rationale Based upon the recreation needs assessment during the preparation of this Element, there appears to be public interest for providing a number ofsports facilities in a centralized location. With the growing population and limited park space for sports fields within the urban areas, a regional sports facility of approximately 100 acres may need to be developed in the unincorporated area of the County. Such a facility would have several lighted fields for softball, baseball, soccer, basketball, and volleyball, and may also have indoor sports facilities. Such regional facilities have been developed in other regions of the state via partnerships between government and private interests. A feasibility study would help the County determine if this is a good idea to pursue.

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within two years of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

County staff costs (unknown) Consultant services ($25,000-35,000)

Funding

Local government agencies State Bond Funds Private investment 27 Proposal #3 Develop a Resource Managemenr Plan for each County park. Rationale The primary reason people are atrracred to County parks is rhe availability of natural resources within and adjacent to the parks. It is critical that these natural resources are protected for future generations to enjoy. It is impossible to adequately protect these resources without an awareness and understanding of the presence, condition and vulnerability ofeach natural resource. For example: - To what exrenr are invasive planrs taking over native vegetation? - To what extenr has, or may, public use impact upon the habitat for wildlife? - What can be done to manage the parks so that natural resources can be protected and enhanced? - To what extent is erosion damaging natural resources and park infrastructure? Resource managemenr plans would provide park managers with vital information about existing resources and guidelines for how best to manage such resources.

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within one year of Elementenr adoption

EstimatedCost

$40,000-50,000

Funding

Solano County General Fund State or federal grants I ( " I I 28

ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT

Proposal #4 Develop a regional park near Argyll off-highway vehicle park, Jepson Prairie Preserve, and the Nature Conservancy property. This area is east ofTravis Air Force Base and adjacent to Highway 113. Rationale Although these areas are privately owned and operated, they are open to the public on a limited basis. In combination, these sites provide for a variety of recreational and educational uses. A county day use park could enhance public access and enjoyment of these diverse areas. For example, facilities could be developed which would support picnicking, informal sports and garnes, walking, biking, resource interpretation, fishing, and more. Also, necessary support facilities such as restrooms and parking would be developed wirhin the county park. Unlike existing county parks, a regional park in this location would be centrally located, and easily accessible because of its proximity to Highway 113.

LeadAgency

Solano County Board ofSupervisors

Timing

Within five years of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

To be determined

FundingSource

State Park Bond Funds Federal Land and Water Grant Program 29 Proposal #5 Develop a regional park near the Western Railroad Museum. Rationale The Western Railroad Museum is a significant tourist site within the County. In addition to being a destination for many visitors, the museum receives significant visitation because of its location on a heavily traveled state highway. In addition to the museum itself, the Western Railroad Museum includes a ten-mile train ride as part of the museum entrance fee. The support facilities for the museum are a gift shop, restroorns, parking and a modest-sized picnic area. The development of a regional park in the vicinity of the museum couId provide recreation facilities that would probably enhance museum visitation and enjoyment. For example, a group picnic area and playfields within a new county park would attract large groups. A visit to the museum could be the highlight for such groups using the county park. A new County park in the area would be developed in cooperation with the museum so that there would be mutual benefits for the County and the Western Railroad Association.

Lead Agency

Solano County Board of Supervisors

Timing

Within five years of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

To be determined

Funding

State Park Bond Funds Federal Land and Water Grant Program 30 Proposal #6 Develop a trail that connects Sandy Beach County Park with downtown Rio Vista. Rationale Sandy Beach County Park is within walking and biking distance ofdowntown Rio Vista and its waterfront area. It would be desirable if park users could enjoy a safe and aesthetically pleasing route between the park and downtown. Such an experience would add to the recreation options available to park users as well as contribute to the tourism goals of the city. The city has already recognized the value of such a connection in the Open Space and Recreation Element of their General Plan which states: Policy G.1.E "The creation ofsuch a trail would required the cooperation of the city, the federal government and any other entities who may own land or be impacted by the proposed pedestrian/biking trail." The County would work in conjunction with the City and Coast Guard on the proposed traiL

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within four years of Element adoption

EstimatedCost

To be determined

Funding

Local, state and federal funds 31 Proposal #7 Expand the day use area at me Belden's Landing facility, and evaluate the feasibility ofadding a campground. Rationale The Belden's Landing facility is located on Grizzly Island Road in the Montezuma Slough area. The park, which opened in 2002, has become very popular with boaters, fishermen and others because of its excellent facilities and access to Suisun Bay. Because of its popularity, the current parking and related facilities cannot accommodate the visitation. Because of the populatiry of this site and the lack of overnight camping facilities in the area, the County should consider the feasibility ofdeveloping a campground on adjacent land. Because of the revenue vs. operating cost of an expanded park this project would be a prime candidate for a partnership between me County and a private park developer!operator.

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within three years of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

Parking expansion $150,000-200,000 Campground expansion $500,000 - 1,000,000

Funding

State Park Bond Funds State or Federal Grants Private Investor 32 I I I I Proposal #8 Expand Lake Solano County Park camping facilities by using nearby public lands. Rationale Lake Solano County Park is vety popular for camping and water-oriented day use recreation activities, During the summer months, the campground is usually full on weekends and holidays (Easter, Memorial Day, Fourth ofJuly; and Labor Day). Furrher, all of the campsites are individual sires which do not lend themselves to group campmg. In order to meet the demand, and increase revenue from camping, additional campsites are needed. There are two sites which are well suited to supporr new campgrounds. The first is a 15-acre site located between Putah Creek and Highway 128 below the Monticello Dam west of the park. This property is parr of a larger parcel which is owned by the California Department of Fish and Game. The site is presently used for hiking and fishing access to Putah Creek. The County could enter into a use agreement or seek a land transfer from the state. The other recommended site is the 6-acre Solano Irrigation property located west and immediately adjacent to the existing park campground. This property provides an excellent location for new group or individual campsites. LeadAgen')' Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within three yeats of Element adoption

EstimatedCost

To be determined

FundingSource

State Park Bond funds Federal grant funds Private developer/operator 33

MANAGEMENT

Proposal #9 Work with public agencies to solve the silr problem at Lake Solano County Park. Rationale The siltration build up on Putah Creek adjacent ro the County Park is causing a negative impact on the park resources and recreation uses. Historically, Putah Creek in this location has been 7-8 feet deep; however, it is currently about 2-4 feer deep. As rhe water becomes shallower, it becomes warmer which results in an increase growth of algae. Algae growth can be harmful to aquatic life and humans engaging in water contact activities. The creek is located on federal land (Bureau of Reclamation) as is most of the County Park. The integrity of irs water source is important to the Solano Water Agency (SWA). Although it would be very expensive to dredge the entire creek (reportedly $50 million dollars), less expensive merhods should be explored with government agencies and others who have an interest in the water quantity and quality of the creek. The County should initiate discussions with the Bureau of Reclamation and the SWA to encourage the development of a strategy for the future protection of Putah Creek and its recreation use for visitors to Lake Solano County Park. Once a strategy is adopted, the County should assist to the extent of its capability.

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Initiate discussions and planning within one year of Element adoption. Implementation ofstrategy within two years of Element adoption.

EstimatedCost

Phase I - County staff cosrs. Phase II - To 1:-." determined

FundingSource

Phase I - County General Fund Phase II - To be identified I I I 34 Proposal #10 Evaluate the County Park Fee Schedule, implement needed changes, and identify other revenue generators. Rationale The only method the County has to off-set the cost of operating its parks is through fees received from park users. Currently, the County collects approximately 50% of what it cost to operate its regional parks. These parks are very popular, and at times, demand exceeds capacity. Public agencies and private interests also offer similar facilities and services within the region. It is important that the County charge fees which are comparable to other providers, and to reduce the need for subsidy from the County General Fund. In addition to existing fees, an analysis should be conducted to determine if new fees should be added for services which are now free. Examples would include dump station fees and on-site registration fees. Also, the County should consider charging higher fees for premium camp sites, and during peak seasons and days. As an example, an increase in fees and new fees could substantially off-set the need for subsidy at Lake Solano Parle. Approximately 24,000 vehicles enter this park each year. An increase ofonly two dollars per car would result in $48,000 (assuming no change in visitation). Additional revenue could be generated at this park during peak seasons!days when the campground demand exceeds capacity. Fees should be reviewed annually and adjusted as needed. LeadAgmcy Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within one year of Element adoption and annually thereafter

EstimatedCost

$20,000 - 35.000 (includes market analysis, and costs to implement changes) Funding Source Solano County General Fund 35 Proposal #11 Investigate the feasibility of creating a Joint Powers Agreement for County Parks management. Rationale The three existing County parks are each located on or near federal or state lands. Also, in each case, other governmental agencies manage nearby recreation areas that offer services and facilities rhat are similar ro the County parks. It is imporrant that each government agency coordinates with one another to maximize public service, minimize duplication of facilities, and have similar use fees and policies. One way to help insure the best public services at the least cost may be to create a Joint Powers Agreement between all the government agencies. The Agreement would provide guidelines that all agencies would follow in the planning, development and management of public recreational facilities and services.

LeadAgency

Solano County Board ofSupervisors

Timing

Within one year of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

County staff costs (unknown)

Funding

Solano County General Fund I I I I I I I 36 I I Proposal #12 Work with public agencies to solve the sand/silrration intrusion problem at Sandy Beach County Parle. Rationale Sand and silt intrusion from the Sacramento River is causing multiple problems at the Regional Parle. During peak park visitation over the summer, the boat ramp is unusable because it is covered with sand and is too slippery for boat launching. Also, the sand buildup prevents boaters from using the boat dock, and prevents park visitors from fishing from the dock. The County does not have adequate staffing to keep the boat launch clear. The loss of this important recreation facility during the summer and at other times results in reduced visitation and park fee income. Solving the boat ramp siltration problem should be researched with the California Department of Boating and Waterways, the U. S. Coast Guard, and the Army Corps of Engineers. The construction ofwing dams, purchase or rental ofspecialized equipment, or a contract to have silt removed at peak use times should be considered.

LeadAgency

Solano County Park Division

Timing

Within five years of Element adoption

EstimatedCost

To be determined

Funding

Federal and state grants 37 I Proposal #13 r Consider rhe crearion ofa Countywide Regional Park District. Rationale Adequate funding to manage, develop, redevelop, and expand the existing County park sys- I tem has not been available from the County General Fund or from park revenue. I· Implementation of the goals, objectives, policies, and proposals within this Element will require funding well beyond what has historically been provided. In addition, open space and regional recreation areas managed by others could become part of the County park sysrem. Considering the ongoing pressure on the General Fund, it is imperative that the County explore optional means to adequately fund a system of regional parks. An alternative that has been used in other counties is the creation of a special district for rhe acquisition, development and operation of regional parks. In addition to providing a designated funding source, a Regional Park District could do the following: - Provide adequate funding to accomplish the goals, objectives, and proposals within this Element. - Consistently identify rhe changing outdoor recreation needs within the County and provide the information ro recreation service providers. - Acrively participate in regional planning matters that have a relationship to regional parks and services. - Improve and expand existing County park sites. - Operate regional park resources now managed by other organizarions and agencies, i.e. government agencies and non-profit groups. - Actively seek legislation and funding that benefit the goals of the District. - Increase public support for improving the environment by preserving and interpreting natural resource areas. Enter into shared use agreements with property owners who are open to multiple use of their land, i.e. water, flood control, other agencies and owners. - Provide technical assistance and information services to those who provide recreation services which attract regional use. There are alternative ways by which a regional park district can be esrablished within State law (Section 5500 of the California Public Resources Code). Although there are several steps involved, it has been demonstrated on a statewide basis that the public generally supports the acquisition, development, and management of regional parks.

LeadAgency

Solano County Board of Supervisors

Timing

Complete feasibility study within one year of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

$25,000 for county staff costs or consultant services

FundingSource

Solano County General Fund , i \ I I 38 Proposal #14 Evaluate the desirability and the feasibility ofowning and/or operating the areas listed below as parr of the Solano County Regional Park System. Rationale As discussed within the Park and Recreation Element (pages 6-8), there are several areas within Solano County that have significant resource values and recreation use potential. It is the responsibility of the County to evaluate these areas in cooperation with the applicable agency to determine if they should be made part of the County Park System, or operated by the County under some type ofa management agreement. Further, during the development and review of the draft Park and Recreation Element, interested citizens asked that these sites be considered. Sites To BeEvaluated Lagoon Valley Park - This is a 360 acre regional park located adjacent to Interstate 80 in the south-western corner ofVacaville. The park is owned and managed by the City of Vacaville, and supports a variety of day use recreation activities. Vallejo Lakes Watershed - The City ofVallejo owns 2,700 acres of land surrounding Lakes Madigan and Frey which are in west central Solano County. Access to the areas is via Green Valley Road. There is currently no recreation development on the property, and access is restricted to City personnel. Benicia State Recreation Area - This is a 367 acre facility lying on Southampton Bay between Vallejo and Benicia. Interstate 780 borders the area on the north and east, while the bay is to the south. The site is managed by the State Department of Parks and Recreation and is used for day use recreation activities. River Park - The park site is located on the eastern bank of the Mare Island Strait just south of the Highway 37 Napa Rivet overpass. The area is undeveloped and includes about 20 acres ofsalt-water marsh and 55 acres of dredge spoils. The Greater Vallejo Recreation District is the proposed developer!operator of the park. Suisun Marsh Fishing Access - There are several sites within the Suisun Marsh which have been identified as possible fishing access areas. These include Potrero Hills ditch, Cordelia-Goodyear ditch, Boyton-Cordelia ditch, cutoff slough, Grizzly Island, and the Montezuma Slough Wildlife Area. Some of these areas are already used for fishing access but additional facilities and management are needed. Putah Creek Fishing Access - This 15 acre site is located between Putah Creek and Highway 128 just below the Monticello Dam. The site is managed by the State Department of Fish and Game, and is used for day use activities such as fishing, hiking, and nature study. Sky Valley-Cordelia Hills Open Space - Located in southern Solano County in the triangle formed by Interstate 80, 680 and Lake Herman Road, this 10,000 acre area could provide many recreation and resource preservation benefits. The cities of Fairfield, 39 Benicia, Vallejo, and Solano County have formed a Joint Powers Aurhority ro help rhe Solano Land Trusr acquire rhis area for public benefir. Jepson Prairie Preserve - Locared between Travis APB and Highway 113, this 1,566 acre preserve has some of the best remaining vernal pooll native grassland ecosystems in California. The preserve is managed by the Solano Land Trust and is open to the public during daylight hours. Rush Ranch - An operating cattle ranch containing 2,070 acres. The preserve is located on Grizzly Island Road east of the City of Suisun City. The ranch has both natural and cultural resources which are being preserved and interpreted by the Solano Land Trusr. Lynch Canyon - This site is owned and managed by the Solano Land Trust. The area includes 1,039 acres of rolling hills and grass lands, with spectacular views of the North Bay. Guided hikes are provided by the Trusr. Lake Herman Park - This is a 648 acre park located on the northern edge of the City of Benicia adjacent to Lake Herman Road. The park is owned and maintained by the City of Benicia. It contains a 22 acre lake which serves as a supplemental water source for the City. The park provides for such day use activities as fishing, picnicking, and hiking. Rockville Hills Park - The park is a 495-acre site on the south side of Rockville Road between Green Valleyand Suisun Valley. The site is primarily hilly, with attractive foothill vegetation and a 5-acre lake. It is primarily used for hiking and mountain biking related activities. The site is owned and operated by the City of Fairfield. Liberty and Prospect Islands - These islands are located on the eastern edge of Solano County north of the City of Rio Vista. These islands have been proposed for a National Wildlife Refuge; however, this proposal is on hold. The Delta Protection Commission has asked that the County consider operating these islands for such recreation uses as hunting, fishing, non-motorized boating, and wildlife observation. Mare Island Regional Park - This I72-acre area is at the southern most end of the island and has been proposed as a regional park. Possible uses of the site include walking, biking, and horse trails. Potential passive uses include wildlife viewing and eco-recreation,

LeadAgency

Solano County Parks Division

Timing

Within one year of Element adoption

Estimated Cost

County staff costs (unknown) Consultant services ( $35,000-50,000)

Funding

Solano County General Fund State or federal grants 40 'I ,( I I,

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

Proposal Target Completion Date 1 Develop a master development/use plan for Sandy Beach, Lake Solano, and Belden's Landing County parks. x 2 Determine if a regional sports facility is needed and can be self supporting. x 3 Develop a Resource Management Plan for each County park. x 4 Develop a regional park near Argyll off-highway vehicle park, Jepson Prairie Preserve, and the Nature Conservancy x property. 5 Develop a regional park near the Western Railroad Museum. x 6 Develop a trail that connects Sandy Beach County Park with downtown Rio Vista. x 7 Expand the day use area at the Belden's Landing facility and evaluate the feasibility of adding a campground. x 8 Expand Lake Solano County Park camping by using nearby public lands. x 9 Work with public agencies to solve the silt problem at Lake Solano County Park x 10 Evaluate the County Park Fee Schedule, implement needed changes, and identify other revenue generators. x 11 Investigate the feasibility of creating a Joint Powers Agreement for County Parks Management. x 12 Work with public agencies to solve the sand/siltration intrusion problem at Sandy Beach County Park. x 13 Consider the creation of a countywide Regional Park District. x 14 Evaluate the desirability and the feasibility of owning and/or operating the areas listed as part of the Solano County x Regional Park system. . 41

Chapter Six

IMPLEMENTATION ALTERNATIVES

This chapter summarizes the major concepts of the Park and Recreation Element, defines rhe implementation roles of the Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission and describes alternative implementation tools.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

The central concepr of the Park and Recreation Element is found in its orientation toward meeting unmer regional recreation needs. The element finds thar Solano County has particular recreation needs both present and future thar relate to all segments of the population. The Element should function to help fulfill these needs. A number ofsub-concepts or themes give shape and definition to the Park and Recreation Element. The County is found to have two major roles in relation to recreation. The first of these is an overall coordinating role among the various entities which provide recreation facilities and services in the County. The second role is the County's function as provider of regional recreation facilities and services which cannot be provided by other public agencies. Cooperation, including formal agreements, between the County and other agencies or private parties is emphasized as a means of enhancing recreational development and services. The Park and Recreation Element seeks to protect existing regional recreation and natural areas. Intensive recreational uses are to be provided in cities and by private recreation providers. The element stresses the need for economy in planning, development and operation of recreational facilities, and proposes multiple uses of land and facilities to provide additional recreational opportunities. The Element also emphasizes the need for maintaining compatible land use patterns adjacent to recreation sites and facilities, and developing and operating facilities in a manner which avoids or mitigates impacts to adjoining landowners.

IMPLEMENTING BODIES

Park and Recreation Commission The Park arid Recreation Commission is the key to implementation of the Park and Recreation Element. In its capacity as an advisory body to the Board of Supervisors, the Park and Recreation Commission can initiate and pursue needed programs and projects by recommending actions to the Board. The Commission can also recommend actions to improve park operations, cooperative agreements with other agencies, and other actions which carry out Element objectives and policies. 42 ( I ! The Park and Recrearion Commission advises the Planning Commission as to appropriate recreation requirements in new subdivisions. The Commission may also review new development proposals, which may affect Park and Recreation Element implementation and offer recommendations to the Planning Commission. Proposals for new recreation facilities and development proposals, which could affect designated recreation sites, are appropriate subjects for review. Planning Commission The Planning Commission also bears an important share of the responsibiliry for implementing the Park and Recreation Element. Since the Element is part of the General Plan, the Commission must find new project proposals to be in conformance with the Park and Recreation Element before they can be approved. The Planning Commission is also responsible for considering Park and Recreation Commission recommendations as to recreation requirements in new subdivisions. IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS The specific actions used by implementing bodies to carry out proposals of the Park and Recreation Element fall into a few categories, which are discussed here as the implementation tools of the plan. Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures are rhe most imporrant means ofcarrying out park acquisition, development and re-development proposals. They can be used to refurbish existing and developing new facilities including parks and trails, as well as ro protect key natural resources through purchase of title or development rights. Included as Appendix F is a description of funding mechanisms rhat have been used in California to supporr park improvement projects and operational costs. Regulatory Authority The Counry can use its regulatory authoriry te-carry out plan objectives through application ofappropriate general plan designations and zoning, setting planned unit development CPUD) standards, design review of project proposals, recreation or open space dedication requirements and environmental review. Administrative Actions and Institutional Changes These actions deal primarily with funding considerations including development of funding sources and institution of operational efficiencies. Some actions, such as obtaining grant funding and taking advantage of free labor sources, can be taken directly by the Park and Recreation Division. Other actions, such as fee increases, require approval from the Board of Supervisors. 43 Interagency Agreements and Coordination Agreements between the county and other government agencies or private parties may be negotiated to enhance provision of recreation opportunities. Cooperarive facility development, interagency maintenance contacts and joint use of facilities are examples. Advocacy The County can actively encourage recreation developments by others that carry out objectives and proposals of the Park and Recreation Element. Actions can include requesting funding for development ofspecific facilities by the state and federal governments, as well as seeking support from other sources. Support for Actions and Programs of Other Agencies The County can provide support for facility development and other actions and programs of other agencies and private parties, which advance the goals of the Park and Recreation Element. Examples of such support are provision of letters of support for grant applications and resolutions ofsupport by the Board of Supervisors. Proiect Review . Projects proposed by other public agencies and by private individuals that could affect Park and Recreation Element implementation may be reviewed and comments provided. Projects to be reviewed could include development proposals, annexations, general plan and zoning changes, new city general plan elements, specific plans and area plans. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Specific proposals and recommendations for implementation are included within

Chapter Five: Plan Proposals.

44 APPENDIXA: PARKAND RECREATION FACILITY INVENTORY Agency Typeof Facility Number of Existing Facilities Number of Proposed Facilities Existing Acreage Proposed Acreage Hiking Trails Group Camping Group Picnic Golf Nature Study SWimming Fishing Mountain Biking Equestrian Boating Historical Other City of Benicia Neighborhood Parks 20 4 66.5 22.5 x Community Parks 1 50 x x Regional Parks 2 577 x x x x x x Special Activity Facilities x x City of Dixon Neighborhood Parks 2 3 9 13 Community Parks 2 1 75 15 Regional Parks Special Activity Facilities City of Fairfield Neighborhood Parks 14 7 160 61 x Community Parks 2 2 74 105 x x x x Regional Parks 1 610 x x x x x x Pocket Parks 3 1 .5 x Special ActiVity Facilities x x x x x x Natural Environment Areas 4 773 x x 45 APPENDIX A: PARK AND RECREATION FACILIlYINVENTORY Agency Type of Faoility Number of Existing Facilities Number of Proposed Facilities Existing Acreage Proposed Acreage Hiking Trails Group Camping Group Picnic Golf Nature Study Swimming Fishing Mountain Biking Equestrian Boating Historical Other Cityof Rio Vista Neighbor- hood Parks 3 act 1,000 4 11 5.1 3 act 1,000 35.4 x x Community Parks 2 acl 1,000 2 15 6.4 2 act 1,000 33 x x x Regional Parks Special Activity Facilities Suisun City Neqhborhood Parks 6 3 33 30.2 x Community Parks 1 10 x Regional Parks 1 79.8 Special Activity Pacllltlee 2 5 x Cityof Vacaville Neighborhood Parks 24 7 131.3 46 x Community Parks 6 3 98.5 127 x x x . Regional Parks 1 306 x x x x x x Special Activity Facilities 17 1 NtA NtA x x Natural Environment Areas 5 2000 46 -->"-- APPENDIXA: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY INVENTORY Agency Type of Facility Number of Existing Facilities Number of Proposed Facilities Existing Acreage Proposed Acreage Hiking Trails Group Camping Group Picnic Golf Nature Study Swimming Fishing Mountain Biking Equestrian Boating Historical Other City 01 VallejoJ Greater Vallejo Recreation District Nelqhborhood Parks 18 88.1 X Community Parks 7 92.8 x x Regional Parks 2 3 95 95 x x x x x Special Activity Facilities 7 8.9 x Natural .Environment Areas 1 20? x x Solano County Regional Parks 2 213 Special Activity Facilities 1 10 x x x x x x x x Natural Environment Areas x x X State Depl, State of Parks & Recreation Recreation Areas 1 376 Special Activity Facilities 47 \ APPENDIX B: COMMUNITY MEETINGS FOR SOLANO COUNTY PARKS The information below was distributedin a flyer andpress release in September 2002. Solano Counry Parks Manager Tony Norris has announced that the County has begun the process of updating the Park and Recreation Element of the Counry General Plan. Your comments and participation are vital to achieve a park system that truly reflects the wants and desires of our communiry and the entire Solano Counry. The new plan will provide the Counry with guidance for the acquisition and development of regional recreation facilities to meet the needs of current and future residents. Four separate opportunities to meet with Counry representatives have been planned. Pleaseconsider joining the discussion at one of the following meetings: Ocrober 7, 2002 7:00 p.m. Dan Foley Cultural Center, Vista Room Dan Foley Park, 100 Setrerquisr Drive, Vallejo October 16, 2002 7:00 p.m. Joseph A. Nelson Community Center 611 Village Drive, Suisun City October 24, 2002 7:00 p.m. McBride SeniorCenter 411 Kendal Street, Vacaville October 29, 2002 City Council Chambers Main Street, Rio Vista For more information about the park planning project, call Jack Harrison at the Solano Counry Department of Environmental Management at (707) 421-6765. Public Input Sought for County Parks Solano Counry is currently updating the Park and Recreation part of the General Plan. This new plan will provide the Counry with guidance for the acquisition and development of regional recreation facilities to meet the needs of current and future residents. In addition to the public feedback meetings held during October, the Counry has developed a survey that solicits public opinion on the plan. With the feedback from the meetings and survey, we will be able to achieve a park sysrem that truly reflects the needs of Fairfield and Solano Counry. The survey, which takes just a few minutes to complete, is available online at www.solanocounry.com under "What's New." The public is invited to comment now through November 14th. For more information, contact Jennifer Kaiser at the number above, or Jack Harrison at (707) 421-6765. r I 48 APPENDIX C: RECREATION PREFERENCE SURVEY & RESULTS The numbers below are the result ofsurveys distributed at thepublicforums and on the Solano County websitein October and November 2002. Approximatelyfive hundred responses were received Listed below are a series of recreation activities that may occur in a park. Please prioritize your preference for each: after each activity, indicate how important these are to you, that is, in which ones you would be most likely to participate. H= highly important M= moderately important L= least important Hiking 70 Boating (non-motorized) 15 Nature appreciation 68 Horseback ridinq 14 Bike riding on paved roads/trails Historical appreciation 62 51 Shooting Boating (motorized) 11 10 Regional cultural events 43 Archery 9 Group picnicking 42 Golfing 8 Fishinq 29 Hunting 8 Camping (no utilities) 26 Off-road vehicles 8 Camping (hookups) 25 Bird watching . 6 Swimming (open water) 25 Dog park 5 Bike riding off pavement 23 Model airplanes 5 Group camping 23 Model boats 4 Regional sporting events 16 Hang gliding 2 The numbers above represent scores for ranking as "highly important." 49 APPENDIX D: SOLANO COUNTY DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY 1980 Census 2000 Census Difference 2015 * Projected Difference Projected Total Population 235,203 394,542 159,338 +68% 512,000 117,458 +30% Age Group 0-17 27% 28% 1% n/a n/a 18-34 32% 23% 35-54 22% 31% 9% 55+ 19% 18% SOURCE: "Projections 2002," Association ofBay Area Governments i I 50 APPENDIX E: SOLANO COUNTY EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKLAND Existing Proposed Total Neighborhood Parks 68 (499 acres) 31 (220 acres) 99 (719 acres) Community Parks Regional Parks State Parks TOTALS 100 (3223 acres) 23 (481 acres) (1876 acres) (367 acres) 8 31 (291 acres) (772 acres) 8 1 9 (95 acres) (1971 acres) 1 1 0 (367 acres) 40 (606 acres) 140 (3829 acres) SOURCE: Parkland Inventory, November 2002, Solano County 51 APPENDIX F: FUNDING FOR COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COUNTY PARK GENERATED REVENUE The County, through its operation of three regional parks, generates a significant amount of revenue which offsets the net County cost for operating its park system. Fees are collected for day use, boat launching, camping, and other uses. The County also generates revenue from persons and companies who operate concessions within the park and who may rent group facilities. When setting park user fees, the County should be competitive and consider the cost of providing services and affordability for its residents. TAX-BASED FUNDING Tax-based funding includes special purpose sales taxes, parcel taxes, transient occupancy taxes, teal estate transfer taxes, Benefit Assessment District charges, MelloRoos Community Facilities District Special Taxes, and property tax overrides to support a General Obligation Bond. With the exception of the Benefit Assessment District, each of these sources of funding requires a rwo-thirds majority vote. Special Purpose SalesTax. An additional countywide sales tax could be levied on top of the existing sales tax base to pay for park and recreation facilities. The stream of revenue from such a tax could be used to payoff debt from a bond issuance or used annually as revenues accrue. The passage of a sales tax measure would require a twothirds majority vote of residents. Pros - Sales tax can provide a substantial amount of funding. - Funds can be used for any approved purpose. - May be more palatable to voters than property-based taxes or assessments. - Can be used for regional park projects and operations. Cons - Sales taxing capacity under law may not be available in Solano County. - May be seen to compete with other needs that traditionally seek this funding source. - Requires two-third voter approval. Annual Funding Example A countywide 0.125% tax increase could generate about $5 million each yeat in early years after adoption. Annual revenues would likely increase over time as taxable sales increase. 52 I ( 1 Special Purpose ParcelTax. A flat per-parcel rax places a set amount ofadditional tax on every parcel in the subject area. It could be levied countywide. Pros - May be easy for the voters to understand. - Increased revenue as parcels appreciate in assessed value and new parcels are created. Cons - Requires two-thirds voter approval. May be viewed as unfair because it is not based on benefit, i.e. land owners vs, renters. - Not tied to inflation so relative amount of funding would be reduced over time due to inflation. Annual Funding Example There are currently about 125,000 parcels in the County, so a $40 per parcel rax would generate about $5 million annually. Over time, additional parcels may be created. Special Purpose Real Estate Transfer Tax. A real estate transfer or conveyance tax is a tax levied on the sale of property that increases with rhe value of the property being sold. The cost can be borne by either the seller or the buyer. Tax rates and dispositions vary from state to state. California has a property transfer tax of $1.10 per $1,000 in assessed value, with $0.55 allocated to the City for general purposes and $0.55 to the County for general purposes. An additional real estate transfer!conveyance tax could also be established for special purposes through a two-thirds vote. Pros - Ifset at a high enough rate, real estate transfer taxes can create significant funds for park and recreation, particularly in fast-growing communities!counties. Cons - Revenues fluctuate with the real estate market. - Voter approval has proven to be a stumbling block in some communities. - Requires two-third voter approval. Annual Funding Example Revenues from this tax will vary with the real estate cycle. Revenue estimares were made under a series ofconservative assumptions. Under a $2.00 per $1,000 of property value turned over, a total of $2 million could be generated each year. 53 Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Special Tax. A Mello-Roos places a special tax on an area to finance authorized community facilities and services. The cities within Solano County have created Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts to pay fot park development and maintenance. Mello-Roos Districts tend to encompass large development projects and require a two-thirds majority vote of landowners. Pros - Can cover a specific, limited area. - Can provide ongoing funding for services. - Can be used for acquisition, improvement and maintenance. - Can be put into place through agreement wirh developers of new development areas. - The facilities and real property acquired and improved need not be located within the district. - Tax formula need not be based on benefit (but can be). Cons - Requires approval of landowners of two-third voting elecrorate in inhabited areas or of the landowners in uninhabited areas. - Some County residents are already subject to Mello-Roos fees and may be reluctant to add anorher such tax. Annual FundingExample A Mello-Roos SpecialTax could be introduced ro cover rhe development and management of regional parks. The Special Tax could be formulated in a number of ways. If applied to residential units only, a $15 per residential unit tax would be sufficient ro generate an average ofabout $2 million each year in the early years. Over time, as additional residential development occurs, annual revenues would increase. Annual inflators can be built into the tax to ensure that the real per unit charges do not erode over time. Benefit Assessment District. Benefit Assessment Districts, which are subject to Proposition 218, must be based on a determination rhat rhe assessment for each parcel is proportional to the benefit received by that parcel. A Landscape and Lighting District is one type of Benefit Assessment District. Unlike most Benefit Assessment Districts, a Landscape and Lighting District can be used to pay for maintenance, operations, and servicing of park improvements. Pros - Covers a specific benefited area. - Can provide ongoing funding for operations and maintenance as well as acquisition and development. - Benefit-based assessments may be viewed as the fairest method of funding. - Only requires a simple majority as opposed to a two-thirds majority for other tax-based funding measures. - There are options for exempting agricultural lands from the assessment. 54 I . \ /1 I Cons - Requires approval of the majority of the affected property owners whose votes are weighted according to the dollar value of their proposed assessments. - Requires an annual engineer's report, agreement over special benefit by land use, and more elaborate accounting processes than special tax funding. - Subject to Proposition 218 majority protest and election requirements, including annual majority protest hearings. AnnualFunding Example Overall level offunding could be similar to that under a Mello-Roos Special Tax, though the charges to different property owners will vary based on benefit received. Detailed study required to establish potential charge structure. General Obligation Bonds/Property Tax Overrides. The County could issue a GO Bond for the acquisition, development and rehabilitation of regional parks, The bond could finance capiral improvements while the bond principal and interest would be paid back over rime, generally by an increase in taxes. The passage ofsuch a bond would require a two-thirds majority vote of county residents. Pros Can be issued by a city, county or special district. - Can be placed on ballot by legislative body or by initiative. - Provides significant "up front" funding. Increased tax eventually "sunsets" which may be palatable to voters. Cons - Requires approval of two-thirds of voters if new taxes are involved. Cannot be used for operations and maintenance. - Not a permanent source of revenue; provides one large lump of funding. - Subject to market conditions and agency debt!credit rating. - High cost of bond issue preparation and administration. Annual Funding Example The issuance of a GO Bond permits the establishment of an ad valorem property tax override. GO Bonds can be funded using several sources of funds. A property tax override ofabout 0.03 percent would be sufficient to generate about $5 million each year in debt service payments on a GO Bond. For the median priced new home in Solano County this represents about $50 per unit per year in the early years. Payments would likely fall over time as new assessed value is added. Older homes with assessed values below median market rate would pay less, and commercial properties would also pay. ss DEVELOPMENT-BASED FUNDING AND PROGRAMS Development-based funding includes funds derived from mitigation fees/dedications. Park and Open Space Dedications and Fees. The Quimby Act allows a city or county to require payments and/or dedication of land for parks as a condition of subdivision approval. The payments Ot dedications cannot exceed the amounts specified in the Act, which are tied to the size of the development. Quimby exactions have been used by the cities of Benicia, Vallejo, and Fairfield to secure park and open space land and improvements in conjunction with major residential developments. However, due to Solano Count"s Orderly Growth Initiative, urban development is directed to existing urban areas. Therefore, when a major residential development occurs, the land is annexed into a city and the development fees collected would be directed back to each city's park program rather than being directed at building a countywide regional park system. Pros o Can provide a substantial amount of park land and funding for improvements depending on the scale ofdevelopment (does not apply to subdivisions with five units or less). o In Solano County this is one way to expand park land within and adjacent to the cities. Cons o Significant park land and improvements can only be secured in conjunction with significant development; no money would be raised in the absence of development. Doesn't provide ongoing funding for maintenance and management. GRANTS Potential sources of grants include federal sources, state sources, regional sources, and private foundations. Most grants require local matching funds, and all grant programs r.quire demonstration ofstrategic thinking and planning in the proposed use offunds. Grants can be used to fund regional parks planning, acquisition and development. Grant funding is rarely availableto fund ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Pros o Excellent source of capital outlay funding. Cons o One-time funds only. o Cannot generally be used for operations and maintenance. o Often need to be matched with local funding. 56 II \ APPENDIX G: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Solano County Board of Supervisors has approved a five year Capital Improvement Program developed by its Park Division. The Plan covers improvement projects at Sandy Beach, Lake Solano, and Belden's Landing county parks. It serves as a management tool to help insure that the most urgent projects are identified and accomplished. The Capital Improvement Program is reviewed regularly, and may be revised annually because of a change of conditions, funding, and priorities. Individual capital improvement projects are described on the following pages. Sandy Beach Regional Park 57 Capital Improvement Projects (Inthousands of dollars) ProjectName: Visitor's Center & Campground Entry Redesign ProjectLocation: Lake Solano Park, Winters Project Category: NewLand, BUildings & (Buyor Build) Project Delivery: Start Date: 71112002 Design - Bid- Build Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Divisfon: NA Description Project No.: 7000021102 Sub Category: Recreation End Date: 613012004 Dept,No,: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation TheVisitor's Center & Campground EntryRedesign is a 5,890SF project conceived bytheSolano County ParksandRecreation Department inconjunction with theFederal Bureau ofReclamation andneighboring Yolo County. Itwill bethefocus ofa nature preserve, trail from "dam todam" along approximately sixmiles ofPutah Creek. Thefollowing functions will beincluded inthe project: redesign oftheentry road tobetter facilitate separation ofthrough traffic, visitor parking and RV check-in, sale ofcamping sundries, maps andmemorabilia, interpretive displays oflocal plants andanimals, large aquariums fordisplay oflocal fish, anAV classroom forgeneral andspecial nature presentations, offices for representatives ofFederal and State Agencies cooperating in the Putah Creek Discovery Corridor Project, aworkroom for and ediling interpretive displays, parkstafftoilets and lockers, public toilets, and vending machines for snacks, soft drinks and fire wood. Estimated ProjectCosts in Thousands Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EIMove: Contingency: $0 $85 $113 $185 $98 $971 $0 $146 NetImpact on Operating Budget This project will result insimplified operational procedures, however, itisa 5,890 SF new facility that will incur regular operating andmaintenance costs. Itisanticipated that operating andmaintenance costs will beoffset byincreased visitor revenue. TotalCost $1,578 Capttal Funding and Spending ptan Year 1 03-04 Projected ReqUirements Source ofFunds State Funds State Funds Unfunded Unfunded Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Yeer(s) Current New Carry Year 2 Yeer3 Yeer4 Year 5 Year Project Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 Total Totai Prop 40 30%match req, 552 0 0 0 552 0 552 0 0 552 852 Prop1230% match req. 852 60 492 0 0 0 0 0 0 492 552 30%match for Prop 40 237 0 0 0 237 0 237 0 0 237 237 30%match for Pron 12 237 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 237 237 1,578 60 729 0 789 0 789 0 0 1,518 1,578 Grass Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 26 26 52 New land, Buildings & Facilities (Buy or Build) - Fully Funded 58 Capitallmprovemenl Projects (In thousandsof dollars) Project Name: Automatic Cashier PayStations Project Location: Lake Solano Park and Sandy Beach Park Project category: Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Bid - Build Start Date: 7/1/2005 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002M Sub Category: SfteWork End Date: 6/30/2006 Dept. No.: 7000 Sub Function: Recreation Purchase andinstall automatic cashier pay stations at Lake Solano andSandy Beach. Each requires a concrete pad plus telephone and electrical service. This project remedies current problems with park feescollections, change making, book keeping and cash handling. Thepercapita program ofCalifornian Prop. 40 will beutilized tofund this project. Net Impact on Operating BUdget Should increase collections and reduce stafftime spent incollections and book keeping. Estimated ProjectCosts- in Thousands Site Site: Preliminary: ProjectControl: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EiMove: Contingency: $0 $10 $15 $0 $0 $60 $0 $17 Total Cost $102 Capttal Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03-04 Projected ReqUirements Source ofFunds StateFunds Totals Prior Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year4 YearS Name ofFund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-05 Proo 40 oer caoita 102 0 0 0 102 0 102 0 0 102 0 0 0 102 0 102 0 0 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Five Year Project Total Total 102 102 102 102 Major Improvements to Exislg. Facilities - Fully Funded 59 Capilallmprovement Projects (In thousands of dollars) ProjectName: Build Cabins forRent andIncrease Utility Services Project Location: Lake Solano Park, Winters Project Category: Major Improvements to Extstg.Facilities Project Detivery: Design- Bid - Build Start Date: 71112004 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002K Sub Category: Additions End Date: 613012005 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Purchase andinstall eight prefabricated log cabins. Provide electricity andwater toeach cabin. Provide electricity and water to16 additional campsites perprevious plan. This project will result inincreased revenue for thecampground. Thepercapita program ofCalifornian Prop. 40 will beutilized tofund this project. Net impact on Operating Budget Building eight new camp ground cabins for rent will increase operating and maintenance costs. Estimated ProjectCostsM in Thousands SfieSfie: Preliminary: Project Control: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EIMove: Contingency: $0 $35 $45 $25 $33 $250 $0 $57 Total Cost $445 Capital Funding and Spending ptan Year 1 03-04 Projected Requirements Source ofFunds Slate Funds Totals Current New Carry Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 YearS Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 0 0 445 445 0 0 0 Five Year Project Total Total 445 445 Prior Fund Expiration Year(s) Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Proo 40 oer ceona 445 0 445 0 0 0 445 445 0 0 0 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 34 34 34 103 445 445 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 60 Capilallmprovement Projects (In thousands of dollars) ProjectName: Docks, Trans, Beaches, Wetlands, Utilities Project Location: Project Category: Lake Solano Park, Winters Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Design - Bid- Build Start Date: 71112005 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: Description Project No.: 700oo21102A Sub Category: SlIeWork End Date: 613012006 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation 1. Replace eXisting boatrental decks 2. Construct 6 ft.wide accessible trail between theyouth area and thepicnic area. Install one 60 ft. suspension bridge and one 15ft. Bridge, bothADA acaessible. Gradegravel andasphaltthetrail. This pricemaybe reduced if we usecounty jailinmates tc clear thetrail first. If wehave a suspended walkway over thetulle marsh, as suggested bytheBureau of Reclamation theprice wilisurelydouble. 3. Create two buoyed offpUblic wading beach areas adjacent topicnic areas and construct anADAaccessible fishing pier. The beach areas would replace theexisting swimming pond that requires ongoing and extensive water testing andanti contamination measures, Theshore line would begraded intwo areas, anda combination offabric and sand would beplaced below water level, 4. Convert theexisting swimming pond into a native wetlands area. Remove theunder ground liner andmost oftheexisting sand andplantwetland vegetation. 5. Expand utility service tocamp sites not yetprovided with service under prop 12. Thepercapita program ofCalifornia Prop. 40 will beutilized tofund this project. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated Project Costs - in Thousands SlteSlle: Preliminary: Project Central: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EIMove: Ccntingency: $0 $60 $45 $56 $0 $640 $0 $160 Unknown Tctel Cost $961 CapRal Funding and Spending Plan Source ofFunds StateFunds Totals .- Prior Year1 03-04 Projected Requirements Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year 4 Year5 Year Project Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 0S-06 06-07 07-0a Tctal Tetal Proo40 cercaolta 961 0 0 0 961 161 aoo 0 0 961 961 961 0 0 0 961 161 aoo 0 0 961 961 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 60 60 120 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fuily Funded 61 Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) ProjectName: Miscellaneous Projects, Well, Tables, Signs ProjectLocation: Belden's Landing Park, Suisun Project Category: Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Bid - Build Start Date: 7/1/2002 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021007 Sub Category: Site Work End Dale: 6/3012003 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation 1. Newwater well and irrigation system 2. New tables, benches and trash containers 3. Newinterpretive sings and display cases The per capftaprogramof California Prop. 12 will be utilizedto fund this project. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated ProjectCosts in Thousands Site Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EIMove: Contingency: Thisproject will result inreduced operating and maintenance costs Total Cost $0 $15 $0 $0 $0 $53 $0 $7 $75 Funding and Spending Plan Projected Requirements Source of Funds Stale Funds Totals Prior Year 1 03-04 Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year Project Nameof Fund Amount Dale Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05·06 06-07 07·06 Total Total Pron 12 nor caolta 75 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Improvements to EXistg. Facilities - Fully Funded 62 Capilallmprovement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Miscellaneous Repairs, Replacements andImprovements Project Location: Sandy Beach Park, Rio Vista Prqject Category: Major Improvementsto EXistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Bid - Build Start Date: 7/1/2003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002J Sub category: Site Work End Date: 6/3012004 Dept, No.: 7000 Sub Function: Recreation Informational signs, boat ramp-dock repair and irrigation sprinklers at Sandy Beach. This project remedies problems resulting from deferred maintenance, general agerelated degradation ofpark infrastructures, and non-compllance with requirements ofCalifornia Title 24/ Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Thepercapita program ofCalifornia Prop, 40 will beused tofund this project. Estimated ProjectCosts* in Thousands Net Impacton Operating Budget This project will result ina minor reduction inoperating andmaintenance costs. Site Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&E/Move: Contingency: $0 $15 $0 $0 $0 $41 $0 $4 Total Cost $60 CapRal Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03-04 Projected ReqUirements Source ofFunds State Funds Totals current New Carry Expense Funding Forward 60 0 0 Year 2 Year3 Year 4 YearS 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 0 0 0 0 Prior Fund Expiration Yearts) Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Pron 40 cer canlta 60 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Five Year Project Total Total 60 60 60 60 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 63 ---------------------------_.. Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) ProjectName: NewShower Building Project Location: Sandy Beach Park,Rio Vista ProjectCategory: Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Design· Build Start Date: 11112003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002A Sub Category: Add.ions End Date: 613012002 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Build a new ADAcompliant structure with four shower stalls, two sinks, skylights, and interior lighting Thepercapita program ofCalifornia Prop. 12will beused tofund this project. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated Projectcosts- in Thousands Site Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&ElMove: Coniingency: $0 $30 $30 $10 $0 $65 $0 $27 Thisproject Will result inincreased operating and maintenance costs. Total Cost $162 Cap"al Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03·04 Projected Requirements Source of Funds State Funds Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year4 YearS Year Project Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07·08 Total Total Proo 12 osr ceoea 162 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 162 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities • Fully Funded 64 Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Park Rangers Residence Replacements Project Location: Lake Solano and Sandy Beach Parks ProjectCategory: Major Improvements toEXistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Bid - Build Start Date: 711/2003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002D Sub Category: Replacements End Date: 6130/2004 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Replace two existing three bedroom two bathroom mobile homes, include appliances, andrebuild carports, decks andstairs. This project remedies problems resulting from deferred maintenance, general agerelated degradation ofpark infrastructures, and non-compliance with requirements of California Title 24/ Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. The percapita program ofCalifornia Prop. 40 will beused tofund this project. Net Impact on Operating BUdget This project should have little impact on operating and maintenance costs. Estimated Project Costs - in Thousands 5Re Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&E/Move: Contingency: $0 $30 $30 $0 $0 $180 $0 $46 Total Cost $268 CapRal Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03-04 Projected Requirements Source ofFunds State Funds Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year Project Name of Fund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-06 Total Total Proo 40 nercaoita 268 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 0 288 288 288 0 288 0 0 0 0 0 0 288 266 Gross Ooeratlnq & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 65 Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Play Grounds and Play Systems Project Location: Lake Solano and Sandy Beach Parks Project Category: Major Improvementsto Existg. Facilities Project Delivery: Bid - Build Start Date: 7/1/2003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 11170210021 Sub Category: Additions End Date: 6/30/2004 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Lake Solano, two small play systems, one for children 2-5 inthepicnic area andone for children 5-12inthecampground area. Sandy Beach, two play areas with play systems, one for children 2-5 and the other for children 5-12 bathe accessible with paths from accessible pedestrian walks. Thisproject remedies problems resulting from deferred maintenance, general agerelated degradation ofpark infrastructures, and non-compliance with requirements ofCalifornia Title 241Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. The per capita program of California Prop. 40 will be used to fund this project. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated ProjectCosts- in Thousands Site Site: Preliminary; Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&ElMove: Contingency: $0 $15 $15 $0 $0 $122 $0 $30 Unknown Total Cost $182 Capftal Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03-04 Projected Requirements Source ofFunds State Funds Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year4 YearS Year Project Name a! Fund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-Q6 06-07 07-06 Total Total Pron 40 nor caolta 182 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 182 182 0 182 0 0 0 0 0 O[ 182 182 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 O[ 0 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 66 Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Replace Tables & Grills and Build NewGroup Pads Project Location: Lake Solano andSandy Beach Parks Project Category: Major Improvementsto EXislg.Facilities Project Delivery: Bid· Build Start Date: 71112003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002H Sub Category: Slte Work End Date: 613012004 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Thisproject will renew andadd toexisting group picnic areas inboth Lake Solano and Sandy Beach Parks, and itwill result in increased campground revenues. Thepercapita program ofCalifornia Prop. 40 will beused tofund this jporject. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated ProjectCosts..in Thousands Site Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&EIMove: Contingency: $0 $5 $15 $0 $0 $79 $0 $20 This project should have I1ttle impact on operation andmaintenance cost. Total Cost $119 Capital Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03·04 Projected Requirements Source ofFunds Slate Funds Totals Year 2 Year3 Year 4 Year5 04-05 05·06 06-07 07·08 0 0 0 0 Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year Project Name ofFund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward Total Total pron 40 nercacita 119 0 119 0 0 119 119 119 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 119 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Improvements to EXistg. Facilities • Fully Funded 67 Capital Improvement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Restroom Rehabilitation & ADACompliance Project Location: Lake Solanoand Sandy Beach Parks Project Category: Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Design - BUild Start Date: 7/1/2002 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002 Sub category: ADAITitie 24 Disabled Access End Date: 6/3012003 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Lake Solano, replace worn toilet partitions, piping and plumbing fIXtures ineight restrooms, paint interior and exterior walls, re-roof with composition shingles. Sandy Beach, redesign and reconfigure three rest roams for ADAcompliance. Replace existing plumbing, piping and fIXtures including drinking fountains andhot water heaters. Replace existing partitions and lighting. Repaint. The par capita programof California Prop. 12 will be ulilized to fund this project. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated Project Costs - in Thousands Site B.e: Preliminary: Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&ElMove: Contingency: $0 $45 $30 $28 $0 $428 $0 $106 This project will result inreduced operating and maintenance costs, Tolal Cost $637 CapRal Funding and Spending Plan Source of Funds State Funds Tolals Prior Fund Expiration Year(s) Nameof Fund Amount Date Expense Proo 12 cor caoita 637 637 Year 1 03-04 Projected ReqUirements Current New Carry Year2 Year 3 Year 4 Year5 Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-06 a a a a a a a 637 637 a a a a a a a Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: a a a a a a Five Year Project Total Total a 637 a 637 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 68 Capital 1mprovement Projects (In thousands of dollars) Project Name: Road and Parking Area Repair Project Location: Lake Solanoand Sandy Beach Parks Project Category: Major Improvements toExistg. Facllitlea Project Delivery: Bid- Build Start Date: 71112003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002B SUb Category: SITe Work End Date: 613012004 Dept. No.: 7000 Sub Function: Recreation Lake Solano, repair erosion at parking lot drainage inlets, repair pot holes, seat cracks, replace damaged concrete curbs, overlay existing pavement and stripe. Repair a Iandlslde adjacent totheupper parking lot. Sandy Beach, repave and stripe park entrance roadway, approximately one halfmile, from Beach Dr.tothepark toll building. This project remedies problems resulting from deferred maintenance, general agerelated degradation ofpark infrastructures, and non-compliance with requirements ofCalifornia Title 24/ Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Thepercapita program ofCalifornia Prop, 12 will beutilized tofund this project. Estimated ProjectCosts- in Thousands Net Impact on Operating BUdget Site Site: Preliminary: Project Control: A& E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&ElMove: Contingency: $0 $0 $15 $0 $0 $472 $0 $46 This project will result inHttle impact on operating and maintenance costs, Total Cost $533 Capital Funding and Spending Plan Year 1 03-04 Projected ReqUirements Source of Funds State Funds Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year4 Year 5 Year Project Name ofFund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-06 Total Total Pron 12 oer caoita 533 533 a a a a a a a a 533 533 533 a a a a a a a a 533 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: a a a a a a Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 69 Capilallmprovement Projects (In thousands of dollars) ProjectName: Sewer Repairs and Improvements Project Location: Sandy Beach and Lake Solano Project Category: Major Improvements toExistg. Facilities Project Delivery: Design - Build Start Date: 7/1/2003 Department: Parks & Recreation Function: Recreation Division: NA Description Project No.: 1117021002E Sub category: SileWork End Date: 6/30/2004 Dept. No.: 7000 SubFunction: Recreation Lake Solano, install newseptic tanklleach field and connect thenew system totheexisting camper waste dump holding tank. Install four new leach lines totheexisting day use area leach field. Sandy Beach, replace/repair existing sewer pumps and replace guide rails forlowering thepumps into their respective deep sumps. This project remedies problems resulting from deferred maintenance, general agerelated degradation ofpark infrastructures, and non-compjance with requirements ofCaUomia Title 24/ Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Percapilaprograms of Californian Prop. 12and Prop. 40 will be utiliZed to fundthis project. If needed, Robertl-Z'Berg-Harrls programs of these Propositions will alsobeapplied, provided 30 % nonstatematching funds areincluded. Net Impact on Operating Budget Estimated ProjectCosts in Thousands SiteSile: Preliminary: Project Control: A&E: Permits & Fees: Construction: FF&E/Move: Contingency: $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 $60 $0 $11 This project will result inreduced operating and maintenance costs. TotalCost $121 Capdal Funding and Spending Plan Year1 03-04 Projected Requirements Source ofFunds StateFunds Totals Prior Five Fund Expiration Year(s) Current New Carry Year2 Year3 Year4 YearS Year Project Name ofFund Amount Date Expense Expense Funding Forward 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 Total Total Proo40 carceona 121 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 121 121 0 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 121 Gross Operating & Maintenance Costs for: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Major Improvements to Existg. Facilities - Fully Funded 70 APPENDIX H: REFERENCES PLAN ADVISORY GROUP Name Darla Guenzler Steve Rogers Tim Wakefield Ann Buehl Robert Floerke Warner Westrup Jim Sarro Mike Alvarez Jeff Matheson Fred Beiner David Melilli Mick jessup Bob Farrington Rollie Simons Brian Dolan Lori Clamurro Hew Hesterman Tom Kruse Margaret Kralovec Kathy Gibson Jay Seslow Harry Englebright Ted Armstrong Richard Chandler Duane Davis Mike Martin Richard Riddle Tony Norris Lt. John Badiano Pam Muick Jim Ball Representing Bay Area Open Space Council Bureau of Reclamarion Bureau of Reclamation California Coastal Conservancy California Department of Fish and Game California Department of Parks and Recrearion California Wildlife Conservation Board City of Benicia City of Dixon City of Fairfield City of Rio Vista City of Suisun City City ofVacaville City ofVacaville City ofVallejo Delta Protection Commission Greater Vallejo Recreation District Greater Vallejo Recreation District Putah Creek Discovery Corridor Solano County Administrators Office Solano County Agriculture Department Solano County Environmental Management Solano County Parks Solano County Parks Solano County Parks Solano County Parks Solano County Parks Solano County Real Estate and Parks Travis Air Force Base Solano Land Trust Solano Land Trust 71 PRINTED RESOURCE MATERIALS Cities Benicia General Plan (june 1999) Benicia Park, Trails and Open Space Master Plan (july 1997) Dixon General Plan (1993) Dixon Parks & Recreation Plan (2000) Fairfield General Plan: Parks & Recreation Project (2002) Fairfield Master Trails Plan (December 1998) Fairfield Parks Capital Projects Plan (2002) Greater Vallejo Recreation District Master Plan (May 1986) Rio Vista General Plan (july 1999) Suisun City General Plan (May 1992) Vacaville General Plan (1990) Vacaville Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Master Plan (1992) Vallejo General Plan (july 1990) VallejoTrails Master Plan (june 1988) Solano County Resource Conservation Open Space Plan (February 1999) Countywide Trails Plan (April 2002) Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan (November 1980) Tri-Ciry and County OPAl Cooperative Plan for Agriculture and Open Space Preservation (October 1994) Tri-City and County OPAl Cooperative Plan for Agriculture and Open Space Implementation Plan (May 2001) California Outdoor Recreation Plan (DPR, 1993) Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines (NRPA, 1996) Napa County Open Space and Recreation Plan (1998) Yolo County Parks and FacilitiesMaster Plan (2002) Recreation Projects Plan: Delta Prorection Commission (2002) 72 I I I I I I I r o 2 3 4 5Miles r r [ [ [ [ l [ l Solano County Regional Parks Map Adopted by the Solano County Board of Supervisors June 24, 2003 o Existing Regional Parks Existing County operated Regional Parks .. Proposed new County operated Regional Parks SolanoCounty \ Department of Environmental Management 470 Chadbourne Road Suite 200 Fairfield, CA 9453-4' June2003 The Parkand Recreation Element ofthe Solano County General Plan was prepared byJack Harrison ofHarrison & Associates, park and open space consultants, in conjunction with Andal Enterprises, park planning consultants, andAgonia & Associates, environmentalplanning consultants. 73